At UFC 73 in the summer of 2007, Sean Sherk defended his lightweight title against Hermes Franca, and afterward both fighters tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs.Both Sherk and Franca served suspensions but have since returned to the Octagon and will fight tonight at UFC 90, and there's something strange about the way they're being received: The fans love Franca and hate Sherk.
At yesterday's weigh-in, Sherk was booed loudly, and I heard several fans make shouts and catcalls about steroids. But Franca was cheered loudly, and I didn't hear any fan say anything about steroids.
Why? What is it about Sherk that makes fans hold it against him that he tested positive, while Franca is forgiven? It's a strange thing about performance-enhancing drug use, across all sports, that fans and the media have inconsistent attitudes toward the athletes who get caught. Sometimes it's quickly forgiven and forgotten; other times it's a permanent stain on an athlete's career.
For UFC fans, Franca is in the former category, while Sherk is in the latter.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-25-2008 @ 7:45AM
Tommy said...
Maybe because Sherk denied it and Franca owned up to it and served his full suspension without the dog and pony show.
Reply
10-25-2008 @ 9:12AM
Woody Wood said...
I think it more to do with Sherk being a lay-n-pray wrestler. Fans was not really crazy about him before the Franca fight because of this. Plus, he was asshole and he took a title fight with Kenny Florian and he needed surgeries and knew it was going to put him out for a long period of time. I don't know, we fans just saw the steroids as a reason to hate him more.
Reply
10-25-2008 @ 10:43AM
Frederick said...
Probabl;y the fact that sherk still wont admit
Reply
10-25-2008 @ 3:57PM
Brayan said...
Cuz sherk denied it and still does and made it blow up bigger than Franca by going on interviews and making popular his drug use. I can find 4 times as many youtube vids on Sherk steriod use than franca.
Reply