
Randy Couture left the octagon on Saturday night a winner.
It should be cause for celebration. It should be yet another transcendent chapter in an epic tale.
It is not. Instead, it is another in the long, recent line of controversies.
After three hard-fought rounds at UFC 106, Couture was awarded a unanimous decision victory, with all three ringside judges scoring the fight 29-28 for the legend over his opponent, Brandon Vera.
The problem was, Couture (17-10) didn't win. At best, he earned a draw. More likely, he lost. Long story short: the judges erred again.
To be fair, Vera (11-4) didn't exactly blow anyone away with his performance. He fought Couture to a stalemate in the first, decisively won the second, and eked out the third. He may receive the same criticism for his performance as the judges do for their decision. Many will say he wasn't aggressive enough. Others will say he had a flawed game plan. But he was fighting Randy Couture. He was fighting one of the most experienced and craftiest fighters alive. He had plenty to think about.Vera stopped most of Couture's takedowns. He landed the only damaging blows of the fight. He knocked Couture down. He earned a takedown of his own and moved to the full mount.
Aside from an early clinch flurry in the third, Couture's main offense consisted of closing the distance, holding Vera against the cage, and searching for a way to take him down. As executing game plans go, you can't say he was successful in doing anything but slowing Vera down. You can say he dictated the tempo. You can say slowed the pace. You can't say he hurt or even rattled Vera.
There was one takedown (Vera returned to his feet in nine seconds). There was no ground-and-pound. There was little dirty boxing. There were no power strikes landed from a distance.
This wasn't one that was especially hard to score.
The judges scored the first round for Couture. I'd just like to know why? Couture spent almost the entire round in a futile clinch (4:34 of the round, according to FanHouse's unofficial count). He finally took Vera down, but couldn't even hold him there for 10 seconds. He didn't land a single power strike in the round. What did he do to win the round?
FanHouse unofficially counted the landed strikes as 7-7. Couture's takedown was nullified by Vera's rapid escape. Neither man could get any real offense started, and it should have been a 10-10 round. Couture supporters will object, saying he exhibited "octagon control," but failed takedowns do not constitute any type of control, and neither do they deserve a reward.
Largely on the strength of a knockdown and a sizeable edge in landed strikes, the second was clearly Vera's, and the judges agreed. So after two rounds, it was all tied with five minutes to go.
Couture started the third strong with an early flurry against the cage, then clinched Vera. Midway through, Vera escaped, and connected with a body kick, then a head kick. Couture initiated a pair of clinches in the final two minutes. Vera broke free from one, then surprisingly, took Couture down on the other. With 45 seconds left, he advanced to mount, a dominant position, before briefly taking his back (these dominant positions can effectively be characterized as "octagon control"). Couture eventually escaped.
FanHouse unofficially gave Couture an 11-10 advantage in strikes in the third, but Vera the edge in power punching, scoring the most significant blow of the round with a knee to the body. And this time, it was Vera getting the takedown. So here's my biggest issue with the decision: If the judges gave Couture the close first round because of a takedown as the decisive factor, shouldn't the close third have gone into Vera's column for the same reason?
"You just never know. You never know what the judges are looking at when they make the decision," Couture said afterward. "Brandon's a hell of a fighter. He had to dust off his wrestling skills for this one and he definitely did a great job."
Over and over, we hear the same thing: don't send it to the judges. The judges are not perfect, and they certainly have a thankless job that most would want no part of, but the fact is that they accepted the responsibility and so must be open to criticism and questioning. Last month it was Rua-Machida. This time, it's Couture-Vera. Who will be next?
"I'm pissed, I'm really pissed," said a perplexed Vera. "In this sport, there is a saying, 'If you let it go to the judges, anything can happen.' I should have finished him. I had a great opportunity. I thought I won."
Randy Couture is a legend. He's an MMA superstar. He will always be considered one of the pioneers and building blocks of the sport. But he left the octagon Saturday night with something that wasn't his. He worked hard, but didn't do enough. Vera landed more strikes, stuffed Couture's repeated takedown attempts, and scored the more damaging blows, including a knockdown. He left with the better statistics, the highlight moments, and the crowd's sympathy. Everything, it seemed, but the most important thing: the win.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
11-15-2009 @ 10:52AM
OGR81 said...
Vera got mugged! 2nd round was a 10-8 round. Guess the UFC has to protect their boy Couture.
Reply
11-16-2009 @ 7:54PM
adam said...
i watched the fight and vera didnt do crap ,,he kicked him twice and could not use the thia clinch at all,, randy had him up against the fence grinding him , dirty boxed him ,and took away his game , they are both greco roman wrestlers and vera is a foot taller than him and any mistakes one of them is on there back ,you would think he could knee randy but he couldnt, they both had a take down but randy did a little more damage ,and i think the english reff they had sucked,he broke it up way to much ,these guys are working the clinch,, he should have let them stay on the fence and work like randy was ,he broke them up when randy was beating him with the elbows and punchs,,thats BS,,that was the game plan,,, vera lost that fight and randy worked for the win ,,the judges all saw the same thing ,,they always say dont leave it up to the judges and make it clear who won,,and i guess it was clear in the judges eyes sitting 2 feet away ,,oh yea joe rogan is a wanabee mma practioner and deserves a beating ,i wanted randy to body slam him for his nonsense questions after the fight ,and joe your stand up comedy blows you drug addict,, randy is to smart for you to come at him with your naysayer diaria of the mouth get a life joe,,,,dana should fire you for your oppinion ,you should be nuetral with the fighters on tv NY
11-15-2009 @ 11:05AM
nutman said...
UFC Conspiracy Theorists GO!
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 11:12AM
imshortyk said...
I honestly don't see the controversy . . . one could just as easily make a claim that the first round was 10-8 round for Couture, if you want to make the second round a 10-8 for Vera. Randy one the third, without question. A couple strikes don't make up for the three minutes of control. Vera did get him down, but Randy popped right back up and swarmed. I don't see the controversy personally. I had it 29-28 Randy as well.
For once I agree with the judges. Hah!
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 11:24AM
darcrequiem said...
Vera had the more damaging shots by far. It comes down to what the judges were looking for and evidently they saw more value in Randy holding Vera against the cage than Vera crumpling Randy with those body kicks. I would have given the fight to Vera personally but I can see how it go the other way. I tend always favor the fighter that seems to be trying to win the fight. Randy seemed to be fighting not to lose. He wasn't very aggressive at all.
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 11:53AM
J said...
Are you kidding me? randy was pressing the whole fight.Vera did land 2 great body kicks on him,but it as Randy that kept pushing vera against the cage attempting to take him down. the only thing Vera could do in the clinch was wait for the ref to separate them. I give vera a lot of credit for his takedown defense,but Randy Couture was not " fighting not to lose"...He was CLEARLY the aggressor.
11-15-2009 @ 1:19PM
darcrequiem said...
Randy was fighting not to lose. I've never seen Couture do so little damage with his dirty boxing against the cage. Usually he punishes his opponent from that positions. He hammers his opponent against the cage causes them to wilt and he finishes him. He didn't do anything close to that last night.
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 1:39PM
ivylyn21 said...
UFC is clearly turning into boxing...CORRUPT!
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 2:18PM
exp said...
It's crazy to Mike to tell us how Machida deserved his win and Randy didn't. Mike, you have gone off the deep end my brother. You clearly hate Randy Couture or you just like being a sensationalist. Randy's decision was way more justifiable than Machida's and I thought they both won their fights. When people sit on somebody else's stomach for 3 rounds, you guys complain about lack of action and how take downs shouldn't determine the result. When all Vera does is score a take down in the third without landing one punch, you say he won.
Mike, why do you hate MMA so much?
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 4:31PM
johnnynumber5 said...
Your always so quick to throw these absurd insinuations at the contributors of this site. Maybe Mike simply thought that Couture lost this fight like many others ... it doesn't mean he hates Couture. Stop trying to be such a sensationalist all the time.
11-15-2009 @ 3:40PM
eichoro said...
It doesn't matter if Couture only held him down for 10 seconds after the takedown in the first. A takedown is a takedown after holding your opponent for 2 seconds.
Reply
11-16-2009 @ 8:16AM
doniel said...
so what are your thoughts on Vera's takedown in the 3rd round?
11-15-2009 @ 3:46PM
eichoro said...
There is definitely not all that much controversy here. Couture controlled Vera for practically the entire fight. Vera's "takedown" and mount in the third looked more like a slip on Randy's part. Vera got pressed up against the cage at will and stood there with a lost look on his face. I think the ref seperated them once in that situation, only for couture to back him up against the cage all over again. Boring fight no doubt, but I felt that Randy had enough octagon control/strikes/takedowns and just seemed like the better, stronger fighter.
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 4:58PM
exp said...
Mike. I thought you were something when you defended Machida's decision. But then you had to go and attack Couture's win. I know a lot of people are jealous of Couture. I mean he has everything in the world. The money, the girl, the houses, the cars. And he doesn't drink his own pee. It's not fair to attack him like that though. I am sure if this was Fedor, you'd be talking about how Fedor deserved it!
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 5:29PM
Maslin said...
The thing that has been eating at me is the difference between the old Pride rules and the UFC rules for judging fights. The Couture/Vera fight is a perfect illustration of the differences between the two. What is missing from UFC judging is placing a high priority on effort to finish the fight from strikes or submission, and the lack of respect for damage done to the fighters. Under the Japanese system, Rua would have won because of his damage and effort to finish, and the same is true for Vera. Only in the UFC do I see fighters go in with a "hold them to the fence for 15 minutes" game plan and get the W for it. UFC 105 showcased not one, but two fighters who went in without any intention to attempt a submission or knockout. Both Hardy and Couture went for the safe win with the UFC judges, but I hope they won no fans in the process. I understand that it is a difficult struggle that wears opponents down... but for what? Why wear out your opponent if it isn't going to make them more vulnerable to a finish? Vera did a great job of trying to finish an opponent who, in my opinion, wasn't fighting back.
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 5:47PM
Mike Chiappetta said...
If you look back at my column on the Machida-Rua decision, I said I scored it for Rua but could understand the judges who scored it the other way. I thought there was a lot of gray area in that fight.
There wasn't a whole lot of action in Couture-Vera, so in my opinion it wasn't as difficult to score.
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 7:02PM
exp said...
Mike. I still respect you. But come on. I am surprised why you say there was no action. Randy was doing dirty boxing in round 1. I am surprised eveyrone's saying he was just holding Vera. Those short punches actually score points. What did Vera do? He got a take down but he didn't land one punch. Vera didn't want it. Simple as that.
Just because people are in a clinch doesn't mean they are not doing anything. Watch out for those short punches, knees and all that stuff. They do count.
11-15-2009 @ 6:21PM
dcrazyga said...
The writer of this has no knowledge of how to score an mma fight. There are NO 10-10 rounds in mma. There is a 10 point must score for the ROUND WINNER and 9 or less for the loser.
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 8:20PM
imshortyk said...
A shame, 'cause you sounded so confident in yourself. Lol. There are definitely 10-10 rounds. Just like there can be 9-9 rounds. Say if both fighters get a point deducted or something.
11-15-2009 @ 7:59PM
Mike Chiappetta said...
dcrazyga, you are incorrect. Here are the MMA scoring statutes of the Nevada athletic commission:
NAC 467.796 Method of judging. (NRS 467.030)
1. Each judge of a contest or exhibition of mixed martial arts that is being judged shall score the contest or exhibition and determine the winner through the use of the following system:
(a) The better unarmed combatant of a round receives 10 points and his opponent proportionately less.
(b) If the round is even, each unarmed combatant receives 10 points.
Reply